![]() ![]() let's say, adoption of an existing idea/product and name. The above only addresses the merits of the tool itself and doesn't even begin to address how I feel about the. (And in that case I'd be more likely to again use a $30 propane/butane tabletop burner with a pan or griddle plate on top.) So, I'm not sure the "use it like a free-standing stove" is enough of a plus unless you're seriously committed to winnowing down your gear and want a single-burner solution for all your cooking/boiling needs. A fraction of that price gets you a second Coleman propane burner (or a dual-fuel butane/propane stove) and you can cook two things at once. It's also priced like $100 higher than the ur-Skottle on a like-for-like comparison. For the times when I want flat cast-iron, I have a $25 reversible griddle-pan from Lodge that works just fine (though that does necessitate a 2nd burner.) The dished "shallow wok" shape is also critical to a number of dishes and is a key part of how I use the tool.Ī big, flat plate of cast-iron will have good heat retention, but will take longer to come to temperature and can't be used as readily with wet-heavy or "stir-fry" style dishes where I need to move stuff through a pool of cooking fat or sauce. I've never burned my eggs in my Tembo Tusk. The ur-Skottle being thinner steel means that it heats up quickly, and gives good "throttle control". ![]() There's a small amount of value-add there, in that you have access to the burner on the stand without the cooking surface, but there's also value-delete in that it loses a lot of what makes the Tembo Tusk Skottle work.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |